|
Since 1991, my team has been fully planning, designing,
and preparing to build not only the first permanent undersea colony—but also
designing and building prototype undersea habitats as well. Collectively, we
have also logged more hours living and working under the sea than any other
team. During that time, we have been involved in a great many economic
exercises seeking to determine not only the resources and equipment to make it
all come together, but also to fund the active colonies across the world’s oceans
into perpetuity with zero risk of running out of resources and ending the
permanency of the venture. Through all of this focused study during these past
decades, here is what we have come to understand with significant clarity:
In most publicized undersea ventures, even when there is
much smoke and extemporaneous bravado—no actual fire can ultimately exist
undersea! We have seen our share of ventures and those of many others involving
much public smoke and extravagant claims, even by some very famous people, but
not a single one of these has survived. We are the longest-running undersea
colony venture in history—and while we are still working to make it happen, a
vast majority have failed, tossed in the towel, and gone home. I guess they had
better things to do with their lives…
We do not.
From these very diverse groups, there have been
long-running differences in the understanding of a potential undersea economy
and what it requires to market it to those ends. The most popular of these
common hypotheses (with several variations) have been this: “If and when they
could just find someone else to finance them, then they would show a very
attentive and fascinated world that it can become economically self-sufficient,
which would result in the “inevitable” return on everyone’s investment, everyone
would be happy, and they would hence find the success they had been looking for.”
The Bad News
Here are the fatal errors embedded in that argument, as
there are likewise fatal real-world examples to point to.
Jacques Cousteau is gone, and his marketing arm, the
National Geographic Society, has wandered off doing other things long ago. The
poster boy is dead, and his fans are mostly gone with him or in their very
senior years. He built some very interesting expeditions, but in the end, he
himself declared permanency as “unrealistic”. (See Undersea Colonies I – Page
100 bottom paragraph – and from Great Lives from History, 1991, Salem Press,
487).
Neither the 21st-century, media-obsessed public, nor
their media masters, are fascinated or attentive enough to even recognize any undersea
ventures. SpaceX and Elon Musk’s Mars activities have seized the day, and,
along with him, the media.
Priming any economic pump requires ultimate products that
have the potential for financial capitalization. Capitalization is defined
simply as the power of cash flows linked to the viable capacity for marketing
the potential of the venture to guarantee its successful preservation.
Scientific research or tourism cannot afford this infrastructure alone, much
less its perpetual maintenance. Otherwise, all such products such as energy or
mining can be obtained with orders of magnitude of less cost and almost zero
risk from the surface, with another magnitude of less cost per unit mass of
product or kilowatt.
Operating a factory undersea is like operating a vital,
highly effective municipal water supply from down under the aquifer. Or it is
like operating a gasoline station from inside the gasoline storage tank. The
most immediate, logical question is, “Why are you doing this?” The rationality
of building an undersea empire for harvesting any product thus escapes most
humans. That is because there is no discernible defensible reasoning behind
living inside the element being harvested for cash that anyone with any skill
in mass communications has been able to successfully explain. Thus, to light
the spark that would enable a very distracted public to either care about or
understand the concept has been a complete failure across the board.
The Good News
The ultimate good news is going to totally surprise most
media-obsessed individuals: zero justification is required. No one
should care what someone else is thinking because external thought pressures
are useless and typically counterproductive to accomplishing the goals. The
media has thoroughly convinced a very gullible public that we must care what
they think, that they have levied this nebulous responsibility on others that
they must care. They have created the hivemind, so therefore all must come to
be approved by it.
Those who have accepted this nonsense are the village
idiots of the zeitgeist. I stated up front in Undersea Colonies that I am going
to build and live permanently in an undersea colony for a one four-word driver
that is totally sufficient to light that spark among my fellow humans. It is
simple because: “… because I want to”.
No other argument is sufficient or as powerful. I do not
need any other argument. Period. Ever. Just because… I want to.
At first glance at this argument, most would laugh and
walk away at this confession from an engineer who might seem a bit crazy. Until
it is pointed out (this is why clear and coherent messaging that is more than
surface-deep is essential in any endeavor) that there are many cleverly
marketed efforts around the globe that are multi-billion-dollar industries that
are growing successfully—all based on the single “I want to” justification.
A. The world cruise ship industry is currently valued at
$72.5 billion annually. Their customers get on a ship that basically sails in
circles and returns home for a fee of thousands of dollars per passenger. Why
do they participate in this seemingly pointless scheme? The customers will tell
you they do it for the scenery and for the excitement in a thrilling setting.
In other words, because they want to.
B. How about SCUBA diving adventures? This industry is
valued at $20.4 billion worldwide. These people invest many thousands each in
equipment, fees, and travel connections to participate in what is accurately
viewed as a potentially dangerous activity where the risk is justified by “the
undersea beauty” and the excitement of participating in the chancy and often
uncomfortable sport. In other words, because they want to.
C. How about mountain climbing? Here is an extreme and
very risky activity rated worldwide at $18 billion for the excitement and the
views. Why? Because they want to.
D. How about the timeshare and vacation club industry? It
is characterized by buying a tiny slice of the year in a nice place somewhere
away from home for a price that would bring tears to any family budget. Why?
For the “change of scenery” and the ability to “get away from home”. This
$19.23 billion enterprise makes little sense to many, and yet it is big and
growing, just because… those who buy in want to.
So, the engineer is not crazy after all. Those who
participate in A, but not B, C, and D, think everyone else is mad, but not
them. And so forth down the list. The bottom line here, in these few examples
(because there are many more), is that humans are wired to “do exactly what
they want to” and care very little, if any, about other people’s judgments. In
a few years, humans will be climbing on huge rockets to depart forever for
Mars, an enormous and very dangerous risk. Why? Because they want to, and none
of them will care at all what other humans may think.
In a few years, many other humans will depart to live
their lives in undersea colonies. This risk is totally minuscule compared to
that of a Mars colonist. Why? Because they want to, and none of them will care
at all what other humans may think.
How does this philosophy fit into the marketing plan? It
fits perfectly because all these hugely successful activities that millions of
humans participate in every day are highly successful because they cater to
those who want to do them with zero justification by anyone else. No one ever
needs a reason to do exactly what they want to when they want to. In the United
States, we call this “freedom”.
It should be pointless to even have this discussion at
all, except, bizarrely, many who are deeply interested in building undersea colonies
are attempting to make it as difficult as possible for themselves by demanding
that the economic and marketing design be solved even before the colony is
built. It may be bizarre, but it is also understandable because many who have a
keen interest in seeing it happen are puzzled by the lack of progress and are
bored with the status quo, so they try to and account for reasons why it is
stalled. This leads to absurd and wholly ridiculous speculations that typically
miss the mark completely.
The End Game
So here is my take on this—the one who has been leading
this challenge longer than any other. Long before he started SpaceX, Elon Musk
wanted to build a permanent human presence by placing one million new human
settlers on Mars. Using government systems, processes, and technology available
in 2010, it would have cost more than the entire world GDP for fifty years and
still would have been impossible. So, he was forced to reinvent the technology,
hardware, and redesign all the processes and expectations from the ground up.
Then he had to invent two new industries powered by a pair of new classes of
technologies to pay for it all: SpaceX and Starlink. And he is succeeding
brilliantly.
What is his marketing plan? He is providing all the
startup costs with the idea that if you build it, humans will come. The
detailed economic self-sufficiency plan doesn’t have to be broken down and
justified because at this point it is just another pointless debate among
enthusiasts with little connection to a reality that has not yet been invented.
People will go to Mars because they want to. That’s all the energy his programs
need today. His economic success is guaranteed, as is clearly evidenced by all previous
historic movements and human migrations.
The United States is just such an example. Imagine the
absurdity of demanding an advanced economic plan going into that venture! The
Brits had a few crops in mind and the economy of taxation of those who crossed
the sea into an uncertain frontier - just
because they wanted to. Almost 99.999% of the actual economic reality unfolded
over centuries and none of it could have been imagined the day it all began.
The exact same example is also true for the inevitable
human migration to permanently settle the oceans. Just like Mars settlement,
the pump must be primed with investment capital by one man’s dreams of empire.
The same is true with the settlement of Aquatica, defined as the undersea
regions of the Earth, consisting of the one global ocean.
So, then who will prime the economic pump for this
historic aquatic venture?
The Atlantica Expeditions.
What is our marketing plan? We are footing the startup
costs—and if we build it, then the humans who have their own private reasons will
come. The detailed long-term economic self-sufficiency plan doesn’t need
delineation at this stage, as it’s a colossal waste of time—just another
pointless debate among enthusiasts with little connection to a reality that has
not yet been invented. People will settle Aquatica in great undersea cities
because they want to. That’s all the energy our program needs today.
Our future economic success is guaranteed, as is clearly
evidenced by all previous historical movements and human migrations. We are
quite beyond and totally finished with useless speculations. We are an
engineering and research company only, building a permanent empire beneath the
oceans of the world. We get up each morning and go to work every day with
precision work plans tucked under our arms and a clear roadmap ahead in our
briefcase. We are planners, engineers, scientists, and technical experts who focus
entirely on building equipment every day. It’s all we do. And we are doing it
because we want to.
It’s all the energy and the comprehensive strategy we
need to get it all done very soon.
By the grace of God we succeed brilliantly, as we do each
day right now and will continue to do tomorrow.
Because we want to.
|